RESEARCH STRATEGY · BLADERUNNER FARMS

From a broad research brief to a leadership-ready point of view.

I led a workstream spanning competitor activity, media opportunities, event and trade-show pricing, and outreach research, then developed and presented the findings in PowerPoint.

Research lead · 2026 · Web research, rate cards, Excel, PowerPoint

DECISION NEED

A clearer view of where the brand could earn relevant visibility.

MY RESPONSIBILITY

Own the research workstream and structure the comparison.

RESEARCH AREAS

Competitors, media, events, trade shows, pricing, and outreach.

OUTPUT

A research matrix and leadership presentation.

Turfgrass brand serving golf, sports, commercial, and residential applications.

THE ASSIGNMENT

Make a wide field of visibility options easier to compare.

BladeRunner Farms operates in a specialized category. An outlet or event can look prominent and still be a weak fit if its audience, format, timing, cost structure, or access path does not match the company’s priorities.

Leadership needed more than a list of links. I was responsible for building the research structure, gathering the available practical details, and translating the field into a presentation they could review together.

RESEARCH ARCHITECTURE

I separated the brief into questions leadership could evaluate.

COMPETITIVE CONTEXT

What was the category already doing?

Review competitor and social activity to understand the channels, messages, and visibility patterns already present in the market.

MEDIA LANDSCAPE

Where could the brand appear?

Identify relevant outlets and placement types, then gather available rate-card or outreach information for comparison.

EVENTS AND TRADE SHOWS

Which rooms might matter?

Research audience alignment, format, timing, price structure, and the practical path to participation.

OUTREACH

How would the opportunity move forward?

Capture the contact route or next research step so a promising option did not stop at a name on a slide.

Group of professionals discussing data analytics in a modern office setting.
COMPARISON CRITERIA

A good opportunity had to be practical as well as interesting.

01

Audience fit

The people an outlet or event was positioned to reach.

02

Format and placement

The type of presence or participation being offered.

03

Timing and price structure

Available scheduling and rate information that made options comparable.

04

Contact path

The outreach route or next step required to explore an option.

05

Leadership relevance

Why the opportunity belonged—or did not belong—in the decision conversation.

FROM RESEARCH TO PRESENTATION

The deliverable needed to do more than prove the research happened.

01

Open wide

Scan the competitive, media, and event landscape broadly enough to avoid anchoring on the first obvious options.

02

Normalize the details

Organize inconsistent public information and available pricing into categories that could be reviewed side by side.

03

Narrow the field

Prioritize the options that made sense to elevate based on audience, practicality, and the leadership question.

04

Present the point of view

Build and deliver a PowerPoint that gave leadership a structured basis for discussion.

WHAT I DELIVERED

A research matrix and a leadership presentation.

The work brought competitors, media opportunities, event considerations, price information, and outreach details into one coherent narrative. Leadership retained responsibility for the final budget and placement decisions; my contribution was to make those choices easier to understand and compare.

Jamy Laury with the HCP Associates team at a company event
WHY IT MATTERS

Research becomes strategic when it narrows the field responsibly.

This case demonstrates research leadership, structured comparison, commercial awareness, and executive presentation. Its strength was the ability to turn a broad assignment into a decision-ready point of view.

KEEP EXPLORING

Florida Trend C-suite research

Scroll to Top